Bibliographic record
Abstract
In March 1956, the popular writer Colin MacInnes published an essay in the journal Twentieth Century titled ‘A short guide for Jumbles’. The essay was in the form of an imaginary dialogue between a white British citizen – the ‘Jumble’ of the title, a corruption of ‘John Bull’ – and MacInnes, who proceeded to explain and advocate for the presence of postwar Britain’s new African, Caribbean and South Asian populations. In answering questions such as ‘ why do they come here ?’ and ‘ is there a colour bar in England ?’ MacInnes involves himself in two tasks simultaneously: providing the Jumble with an impression of how Britain’s latest migrants see host peoples, and offering a sympathetic if combative account of the fortunes of the migrants that is ultimately intended to challenge racist and prejudicial views. Standing between native and newcomer, acting as a way of opening an enlightening envisioning of one to the other, MacInnes occupies an unsteady but illuminating vantage point. Born in London in 1914, he was raised in Australia and only returned to the county of his birth in 1931, settling in London after World War II. Neither native Londoner nor New Commonwealth migrant, MacInnes considered himself ‘partly a foreigner’ when he returned to London as a young man and described himself as a perpetual ‘inside-outsider’ due to his Australian upbringing. Thus, he was both within but to one side of the Britain about which he wrote in his journalism and fiction, and in contrast to those who felt that the nation was threatened by immigration (both at the time and since) he prized keenly Britain’s new migratory multicultural admixture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".