MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484425816 · doi:10.1017/s0373463316000448

Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Depth Trajectory Tracking of Remotely Operated Vehicle with Thruster Nonlinearity

2016· article· en· W2484425816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Navigation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TrajectorySliding mode controlNonlinear systemDead zoneController (irrigation)Remotely operated vehicleRemotely operated underwater vehicleAdaptive controlMode (computer interface)Tracking (education)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceLyapunov functionEngineeringControl engineeringMobile robotControl (management)Artificial intelligenceRobotPhysicsAerospace engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on depth trajectory tracking control for a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) with dead-zone nonlinearity and saturation nonlinearity of thruster; an adaptive sliding mode control method based on neural network is proposed. Through the analysis of dead-zone nonlinearity and saturation nonlinearity of thruster, the depth trajectory tracking control system model of a ROV which uses thruster control signals as system input has been established. According to the principle of sliding mode control, an adaptive sliding mode depth trajectory tracking controller is built by using three-layer feed-forward neural network for online identification of unknown items. The selection method and update laws of the control parameters are also given. The uniform ultimate boundedness of trajectory tracking error is analysed by Lyapunov theorem. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated by simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it