MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Chapter 8 Upper gastrointestinal and mediastinal surgery

2011· book-chapter· en· W2484517475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan Wilkinson, Stephen H. Pennefather, R. McCahon

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extract Thymectomy ... Introduction Tumours of the thymus are rare, with an incidence of 1–5 per million population, per year. Thymomas are the commonest mediastinal tumour in adults, followed by lymphomas. ... Treatment options Surgical ... Pre-operative assessment and preparation (See Pre-op assessment) History and optimization Dose of anticholinesterase Relevent investigations Pre-operative planning to avoid post-operative ventilation ... Anaesthesia for thymectomy Induction ... Maintenance Neuromuscular blocking drugs and MG ... Post-operative Special considerations ... Further reading Leventhal SR, Orkin FK, Hirsh RA. Prediction of the need for postoperative mechanical ventilation in myasthenia gravis. Anesthesiology 1980; 53(1):26–30.10.1097/00000542-198007000-00006CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceClose Naguib M, el Dawlatly AA, Ashour M, et al. Multivariate determinants of the need for postoperative ventilation in myasthenia gravis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1996; 43(10):1006–13.10.1007/BF03011901CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceClose Eisenkraft JB, Book WJ, Mann SM, et al. Resistance to Succinylcholine in Myasthenia Gravis: A Dose-response Study. Anesthesiology 1988; 69(5):760–2.10.1097/00000542-198811000-00021CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceClose

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1820.090

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooks→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→