MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484692943 · doi:10.1021/bk-2001-0788.ch015

Farmed Atlantic Salmon as Dietary Sources of Long-Chain Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Effect of High-Energy (High-Fat) Feeds on This Functional Food

2001· book-chapter· en· W2484692943 on OpenAlexaff
R. G. Ackman, Xueliang Xu, Catherine McLeod

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood scienceSalmoPolyunsaturated fatty acidChemistryFatty acidDocosahexaenoic acidBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>BiochemistryFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High energy diets are popular in today's salmon farming, but the lipid deposition in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, particularly in steaks and fillets, and finally the effect of these diets on product quality, have not been examined. Over 12 months three commercial diets were fed, these being similar in all nutrients except the dietary fat levels (25, 29 and 31%). The muscle protein content was not modified by the three dietary treatments. Texture measurements and sensory panels were conducted on two specific sites in dorsal muscle steak cuts. A significant difference in muscle texture was found. There was a positive correlation between dietary fat and lipid deposition in the fish muscles. The total lipids in white muscle were, respectively, 1.27, 1.41and 2.25 %, in the trimmed steaks, 2.97, 4.58 and 5.38%, and in the whole steaks 5.45, 7.64 and 9.76%. The fatty acid composition analyses showed only a slight effect of diet on phospholipids rich in DHA. In the triacylglycerols the fatty acids reflected the dietary fatty acids with DHA and EPA at around 10% each. However, the DHA content slightly exceeded that of the EPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207