MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484752123 · doi:10.1117/12.2231304

The Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER): design and development

2016· article· en· W2484752123 on OpenAlexaff
Keith C. Gendreau, Zaven Arzoumanian, Phillip Adkins, Cheryl L. Albert, John F. Anders, Andrew T. Aylward, C. L. Baker, Erin Balsamo, William Bamford, Suyog S. Benegalrao, Daniel L. Berry, Shiraz Bhalwani, J. K. Black, Carl Blaurock, Ginger M. Bronke, Gary L. Brown, Jason Budinoff, Jeffrey D. Cantwell, T. Cazeau, Philip T. Chen, Thomas G. Clement, Andrew T. Colangelo, Jerry S. Coleman, Jonathan D. Coopersmith, William E. Dehaven, J. Doty, Mark Egan, Teruaki Enoto, Terry W. Fan, Deneen M. Ferro, Richard F. Foster, Nicholas Galassi, Luis D. Gallo, Chris Green, Dave Grosh, Kong Q. Ha, Monther A. Hasouneh, Kristofer B. Heefner, P. Hestnes, Lisa J. Hoge, Tawanda M. Jacobs, John Leif Jørgensen, Michael Kaiser, James Kellogg, Steven J. Kenyon, Richard Koenecke, Robert P. Kozon, Beverly LaMarr, M. Lambertson, Anne M. Larson, Steven Lentine, Jesse Lewis, Michael G. Lilly, Kuochia Alice Liu, Andrew Malonis, Sridhar Manthripragada, C. B. Markwardt, Bryan D. Matonak, Isaac E. Mcginnis, Roger Miller, Alissa Mitchell, Jason W. Mitchell, Jelila S. Mohammed, Charles Monroe, Kristina M. Montt de Garcia, Peter Mule, Louis T. Nagao, Son N. Ngo, Eric D. Norris, Dwight A. Norwood, Joseph Novotka, Takashi Okajima, Lawrence G. Olsen, Chimaobi O. Onyeachu, Henry Y. Orosco, Jacqualine R. Peterson, Kristina N. Pevear, Karen Pham, S. Pollard, J. Pope, Daniel F. Powers, Charles E. Powers, Samuel R. Price, G. Prigozhin, Julian B. Ramirez, Winston J. Reid, Ronald A. Remillard, Eric M. Rogstad, Glenn P. Rosecrans, John Rowe, Jennifer A. Sager, Claude A. Sanders, Bruce J. Savadkin, M. Saylor, Alexander F. Schaeffer, Nancy S. Schweiss, Sean R. Semper, P. J. Serlemitsos, Larry V. Shackelford, Yang Soong, Jonathan Struebel, Michael Vezie, Joel S. Villasenor, Luke B. Winternitz, George I. Wofford, Michael Wright, Mike Y. Yang, Wayne H. Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsReach Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutron starComposition (language)Star (game theory)Computer scienceAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During 2014 and 2015, NASA's Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) mission proceeded success- fully through Phase C, Design and Development. An X-ray (0.2-12 keV) astrophysics payload destined for the International Space Station, NICER is manifested for launch in early 2017 on the Commercial Resupply Services SpaceX-11 flight. Its scientific objectives are to investigate the internal structure, dynamics, and energetics of neutron stars, the densest objects in the universe. During Phase C, flight components including optics, detectors, the optical bench, pointing actuators, electronics, and others were subjected to environmental testing and integrated to form the flight payload. A custom-built facility was used to co-align and integrate the X-ray "con- centrator" optics and silicon-drift detectors. Ground calibration provided robust performance measures of the optical (at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center) and detector (at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) subsystems, while comprehensive functional tests prior to payload-level environmental testing met all instrument performance requirements. We describe here the implementation of NICER's major subsystems, summarize their performance and calibration, and outline the component-level testing that was successfully applied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations527
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207