MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484800233 · doi:10.1057/9781137438904_3

Female Networks for Science: Programs and Politics

2012· book-chapter· en· W2484800233 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christine von Oertzen

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueEliteLiberalismPoliticsAttendancePolitical scienceEconomic historyClubHegemonyLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On July 12, 1920, several hundred people gathered in the auditorium of Bedford College, London, to attend the opening of the International Federation of University Women's inaugural conference. The four members of the IFUW board and 32 official delegates from 15 countries presented the new organization; also in attendance were numerous individual members of the associations in Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Norway, Sweden, and the United States. The guest list also included prominent representatives of British liberalism and conservative members of the British government, selected protagonists of the British women's and suffragist movement, high-ranking university figures, renowned literary personalities, and official representatives of the new League of Nations—in short, the colorful spectrum of those British or transatlantic "internationalists" of the postwar period who had taken up a resolute position against Germany and the Central Powers during the war and who now placed their hopes in the achievement, through the League of Nations and similar institutions, of a peaceful global order based on mutual under-standing and carried forward by an educated cosmopolitan elite.1 Among the eminent guests were Gilbert Murray, regius professor of Greek at Oxford and England's "foremost League intellectual," who presided over the British League of Nations Union from 1922 to 1938; William Beveridge and Graham Wallas, both Fabians and professors at the London School of Economics; the writers John Galsworthy and H. G. Wells, cofounders of the International PEN club formed in 1921; the Australian medic and politician Sir John Cockburn, president of the Men's International Alliance for Woman Suffrage; Lady Rhondda, survivor of the American luxury liner Lusitania that had been torpedoed by German submarines and editor of the feminist magazine Time and Tide;2 Lord Bryce, Regius professor of Law at Oxford, longtime British ambassador to the United States, enthusiastic proponent of the idea of the League of Nations, and author of the government's much-cited Bryce Report on German war crimes in Belgium and France; his colleague, the eminent legal historian and philosopher of law Frederick Pollock from Oxford, who had also been a member of the Bryce Committee; and Viscount Grey of Fallodon, the first president of the League of Nations, who delivered the keynote address.3 KeywordsInternational PromotionBritish WomanBryn MawrWoman ScientistMember AssociationThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207