MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484996833 · doi:10.1021/bk-2002-0803.ch017

Dietary Phytoestrogens: Safety, Nutritional Quality, and Health Considerations

2001· book-chapter· en· W2484996833 on OpenAlexaff
Golam Sarwar, Mary R. L’Abbé, Stephen P.J. Brooks, E. Lok, Gerard M. Cooke, Olga Pulido, P. Thibert

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytoestrogen effects and research
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoflavonesPhytoestrogensGenisteinEstrous cycleEndocrinologyCaseinInternal medicineFood scienceChemistryMedicineAnimal scienceBiologyEstrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Possible health benefits and potential adverse effects of dietary phytoestrogens are discussed. Moreover, data from a 16-week rat study to investigate the effects of the addition of graded levels (0, 50,100,200 and 400 mg/kg diet) of soybean isoflavones to a casein control diet on growth, plasma total cholesterol, plasma isoflavones and length of estrus cycle are reported. An isoflavones-rich extract (Novasoy) and a soy infant formula were used a source of dietary isoflavones. Initial analyses revealed a lower body weight in male rats fed the highest two levels of isoflavones. There was a dose-related increase in the levels of plasma isoflavones. The plasma data showed that the absorption of isoflavones from formula was lower than that from Novasoy. There was also a dose-related increase in the length of the estrus cycle in female rats. The cycle in rats fed the formula diet was, however, shorter than that in those fed the Novasoy diet providing the same amount of isoflavones. This suggested differences in the potency based on the source of isoflavones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicPhytoestrogen effects and researchFrench-language works237,207