Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2010, This Is an Honour Song: Twenty Years since the Blockades marked the anniversary of the “Oka Crisis” with the hope of its editors, Leanne Simpson and Kiera L. Ladner, that it would “honour the resistance and resurgence of Kanien’kehaka, and its influence on the resistance and resurgence movements of other Indigenous nations and its influence on Canada.” 1 The resistance at Kanehsatà:ke and Kahnwà:ke brought national and international attention to the struggle of Aboriginal people for recognition, a struggle that had been going on for at least four hundred years. Haudenosaunee leader Ellen Gabriel states in the collection’s “Epilogue”: “The issue that sparked the Crisis of 1990 was the blatant theft of our homelands, the Mohawk peoples’ sovereignty over those lands and the continued efforts by governments to undermine and defraud us of our international human rights to our homelands.” 2 Prior to 1990, Canadians were generally ignorant of Aboriginal issues. Today, a large percentage when asked will claim to support Aboriginal rights, yet this support has not produced action at the political level. In 2012, the “Idle No More” movement briefly drew attention to government inaction on such crucial issues as education and housing, but for most Canadians, and the governments representing them, Aboriginal issues remain a low priority, and Aboriginal people return to being invisible when the marches and hunger strikes end. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".