Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectif : Un grand nombre de ventilateurs de transport et d'urgence sont commercialiss et de nouvelles gnrations sont constamment commercialises. Ces ventilateurs diffrent entre eux en termes de technologie, de performance, de cot, mais galement d'ergonomie ; la charge cognitive induite (ou charge mentale de travail) par leur utilisation n'est que trs rarement apprcie. En situation d'urgence, une erreur ou un retard de rglage du ventilateur est susceptible d'engendrer des complications ; une ergonomie et une convivialit optimale de l'interface homme-machine sont donc essentielles la rduction de ces erreurs humaines. Les buts de cette tude taient 1) d'valuer l'ergonomie et la convivialit de ventilateurs de transport, afin de fournir aux cliniciens des lments de choix objectifs en termes ergonomiques et 2) d'valuer les dterminants principaux des diffrences entre machines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".