MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485221203 · doi:10.1177/0256090920060112

<i>Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs in Corporations</i>

2006· article· en· W2485221203 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anand Teltumbde

Bibliographic record

VenueVikalpa The Journal for Decision Makers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatus quoDemocracyLocus of controlControl (management)Organizational cultureAltruism (biology)Public relationsBusinessSociologyPolitical scienceManagementPsychologyLawSocial psychologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corporations are essentially fascist and incompatible to democracy, says Noam Chomsky (1994). While they mimic human concerns — caring and altruism — they are ruthless in getting what they want. This trait in clinical terms as per the WHO guidelines qualifies a person to be called a psychopath. A recent Canadian documentary by Achbar, Abbott and Baken (2005) has called corporations psychopath. The general implication of this characterization of companies or corporations is in terms of their culture that essentially reflects the top-down control. The intrapreneurs who are typically defined as entrepreneurs within established organizations and described as intra-organizational revolutionaries — challenging the status quo and fighting to change the system from within thus being a cause of potential organizational friction — are not a natural fit in such cultures. Nevertheless, they are there driven by their internal locus of control, reinventing companies, transforming them, pushing them up to new highs — sometimes with and most of the times without the top management support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVikalpa The Journal for Decision MakersSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207