MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485272963 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/81.s1.537

Markers of Ovarian Antral Follicular Development in Sheep: Differences Between Final (FW) and Penultimate (PW) Wave Pre-Ovulatory Follicles.

2009· article· en· W2485272963 on OpenAlexaff
Srinivas Seekallu, Behzad M. Toosi, Kosala Rajapaksha, Carl Lessard, Anna T. Grazul‐Bilska, N.C. Rawlings

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationFollicular phaseBiologyThecaInternal medicineEstrous cycleEndocrinologyAndrologyAntral follicleVascular endothelial growth factorAngiogenesisBasic fibroblast growth factorFollicleFolliculogenesisOvarian follicleGrowth factorHormoneEmbryogenesisEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment of non-prolific Western white-faced (WWF) ewes with prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) and medroxy progesterone acetate (MAP) increased ovulation rate. The increase in ovulation rate was achieved largely by the addition of the ovulation of follicles from the penultimate (PW) follicular wave of the cycle to the expected ovulation of follicles from the final (FW) wave of the cycle. However, the number of lambs born after this treatment was not enhanced, suggesting that the PW follicles ovulating were not functionally viable. We were interested to compare the functional viability of PW and FW follicles. The objective of this study was to evaluate the expression of markers of vascularization and/or angiogenesis: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and Factor VIII; a marker of gap junctional communication, connexin (Cx) 43; and a marker of cellular proliferation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in preovulatory follicles obtained from the PW and FW in WWF ewes treated as described above. On day 8 of the estrous cycle, 15 ewes were given a single injection of PGF2alpha (15 mg i.m) and an intravaginal MAP sponge, which remained in place for 6 days. Thirty six to forty eight hours after sponge removal, ewes were ovariectomized by mid-ventral laparotomy. Ovaries that contain FW and/PW follicles from 7 ewes were fixed in Carnoy's solution for immunohistochemical detection of selected proteins. Computerized image analysis was used for quantification of protein expression. Granulosa and theca were isolated from FW and PW follicles from the remaining 8 ewes, suspended in PBS and stored at -80°C until RNA extraction. Messenger RNA levels were quantified using real-time PCR. Prostaglandin F2alpha and MAP treatment gave rise to preovulatory follicles emerging both from the FW and PW of the cycle; PW follicles had a longer (P<0.05) lifespan compared to FW follicles (7.1 ± 0.2 vs 3.0 ± 0.2). Protein expression for VEGF, eNOS, Cx43, PCNA and Factor VIII was greater in FW than in PW preovulatory follicles (P<0.05). For granulosa cells, Cx43 mRNA expression was greater (P<0.05) in FW than in PW preovulatory follicles. For theca cells, VEGF mRNA expression was greater (P<0.05) in FW than PW preovulatory follicles. In conclusion, expression of some markers of vascularization/ angiogenesis, gap junctional communication and cell proliferation appeared to be decreased in PW compared to FW preovulatory follicles. This suggests that although the treatment with PGF2alpha and MAP enhanced ovulation rate by extending the lifespan of PW follicles, these follicles were not as functionally viable as FW follicles. Therefore, this treatment provides a useful model to study aged antral follicles. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207