← Back to cohort
Proceedings of the 1996 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueDevelopments in marketing science: proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science · 2015
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Marketing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCalifornia State University, FullertonCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversidad de ChileNanyang Technological UniversityUniversity of Tennessee, KnoxvilleLoyola Marymount UniversityUniversity of South DakotaIllinois State UniversityTowson UniversityFordham UniversityNova Southeastern UniversityUniversity of OregonBinghamton UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityOld Dominion UniversityUniversity of the PacificNorthern Arizona UniversityUniversity of North TexasUniversity of AkronArkansas Tech UniversityYoungstown State UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of OklahomaLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of KentuckyNorthern Kentucky UniversityBradley UniversityUniversity of Cape TownMississippi State UniversityEastern Washington UniversityUniversity of OttawaFlorida International UniversityBoston CollegeSyracuse UniversityUniversity of PittsburghFlorida State UniversityIndiana State UniversityJames Madison UniversityUniversity of Northern ColoradoMichigan State UniversityTechnological University DublinUniversity of Northern IowaGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of St. ThomasLouisiana Tech UniversityUniversity of GeorgiaValdosta State UniversityWashburn UniversityBrigham Young UniversityTexas Tech UniversityGeorgia Institute of TechnologyDe Montfort UniversityPurdue UniversityUniversity of RochesterAcademy of MarketingUniversity of MiamiBowling Green State UniversityCharles Sturt UniversityWestern Michigan UniversityFairleigh Dickinson UniversityClemson University
KeywordsPhoenixLibrary scienceCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Political scienceEngineeringGeographyComputer scienceArchaeologyMechanical engineeringPhysics
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.206
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.206 | 0.077 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno