MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2486030042 · doi:10.1057/9780230597914_11

Zelda as Patient

2004· book-chapter· en· W2486030042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linda Wagner‐Martin

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeReputationDaughterFace (sociological concept)Quarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyPsychoanalysisHistoryLawSociologyPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"I left my capacity for hoping on the little roads that led to Zelda's sanitarium," Scott wrote in his Notebooks.1 There is slight reason to think Fitzgerald's almost continuous references to Zelda's mental illness were entirely self-serving; he did not refer to her and her condition as a means of getting attention, nor did he use her breakdowns as a way of legitimating his heavy drinking. Despite his cruelly defensive remarks when he was made to face her, particularly in the company of her doctors or psychiatrists, Scott Fitzgerald in 1934 was forced to realize that his carefully orchestrated life as the male half of a celebrated couple had ended. His "life" as he had created it was gone. Left with the care of not only his wife but also his daughter, his mother, his professional reputation as one of the great contemporary writers, and himself, Fitzgerald at scarcely thirty-seven was bereft of confidence—both emotional and financial. He had assumed he and Zelda would be partners throughout their lives. Now he knew they would not be.KeywordsPsychotic DisorderShock TreatmentFatigue SymptomProfessional ReputationFreudian PsychoanalysisThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207