Abstract 3792: PAPSS1 (3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate synthase 1) inhibition sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer to cisplatin treatment <i>in vivo</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We previously reported that 3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate (PAPS) synthase 1 (PAPSS1), an enzyme that synthesizes the biologically active form of sulfate (PAPS) for all sulfation reactions, is a novel therapeutic target that when suppressed enhances the activity of multiple DNA damaging agents in NSCLC cells. PAPSS1 was the lead hit in a synthetic lethal screen completed using chemotherapy-naive NSCLC cells exposed to the IC10 of cisplatin (CDDP). PAPSS1 silencing was more effective in potentiating CDDP activity than our positive control (BRACA2). Here, we evaluated PAPSS1 as a CDDP-sensitizing target in three different model systems: 3D spheroids, zebrafish xenografts, and a mouse xenograft model. siRNA-transfected A549 cells were seeded in round bottom ultra-low attachment plates for spheroid formation. Spheroids were formed over a period of three days and then treated with CDDP. The spheroids were imaged using the IncuCyte ZOOM® Live Cell Imaging system every 3 hours for 8 days to monitor changes in spheroid size. To evaluate PAPSS1 in zebrafish, transfected A549 cells were microinjected into the yolk sack of zebrafish embryos and then maintained in CDDP-containing media for 48 hours. The human cells were harvested from 20 fish per treatment group and counted to determine the change in cell number as a measure of tumor growth in vivo. For mouse studies, RAG2M mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 5×106 parental, non-targeting shRNA, or shPAPSS1-expressing A549 cells. The mice were treated 7 days later with 3 mg/kg CDDP (IV, Q4Dx3). Tumor size was measured using an electronic caliper and tumor volumes were calculated using the equation (lxw2)/2. PAPSS1-silenced cells formed spheroids of comparable size as the scramble control. CDDP (12.5μM) was effective against both control and PAPSS1-silenced spheroids with a reduction of 31% and 46% in spheroid size, respectively. PAPSS1-knockdown spheroids were significantly more sensitive to CDDP even when added at an 8-fold lower dose (1.56 μM). At this concentration, the control spheroids grew about 37% in size while the size of the PAPSS1-silenced spheroids was reduced by 21% (p<0.0001). In zebrafish, the number of A549 cells was reduced by approximately 50% with the combination of PAPSS1 knockdown and CDDP treatment relative to non-silencing, CDDP-treated controls. In mice, tumor development was significantly delayed in the shPAPSS1 group relative to both parental (p = 0.008) and non-targeting shRNA (p = 0.026) controls following CDDP treatment. Our study demonstrates for the first time that PAPSS1 knockdown enhances CDDP treatment in vivo. To pursue PAPSS1 as a therapeutic target, a small molecule inhibitor screen is warranted. The availability of a small molecule inhibitor will be essential to understand how PAPSS1 inhibition sensitizes cancer cells (but not normal cells) to DNA damaging agents. Citation Format: Ada W.Y. Leung, Chansey J. Veinotte, Nicole Melong, Ian Backstrom, Corinna Warburton, Edie Dullaghan, Jason N. Berman, Marcel B. Bally. PAPSS1 (3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate synthase 1) inhibition sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer to cisplatin treatment in vivo. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3792.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".