MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2486899397 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv133.1455

Immunogenicity and Safety Profiles of Full (0.5 mL) Compared to Half (0.25 mL) Dose-Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Children 6–35 Months Old

2015· article· en· W2486899397 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Long Wang, Carine Claeys, Vijayalakshmi Chandrasekaran, Ping Li, Bruce L. Innis, Varsha Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunogenicityMedicineVirologyImmunizationImmunologyAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. The licensed dose of inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) in children 6–35 months (m) old varies by product and country (e.g. United States: 0.25 mL; Canada: 0.25 or 0.5 mL) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MMWR 2014;63:691; www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/naci-ccni/flu-grippe-eng.php). Historically, a 0.25 mL dose has been used to reduce reactogenicity, particularly fever and febrile convulsions, in young children, commonly observed for whole virus IV (Skowronski et al, Pediatrics 2011;128:e276). However, split, subunit and recombinant IIV have much lower reactogenicity, thus questioning the rationale of using half dose in 6–35m-olds, who have lower immune responses compared to older children, for whom use of the full dose is standard practice 9 (Skowronski et al, Pediatrics 2011;128:e276; Pavia-Ruz et al, Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013;9:1978; Langley et al, J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2012;1:55). Methods. Here we compare the immunogenicity and safety profiles of GSK Vaccines' trivalent IIV (Dresden, Germany, IIV3-D; Québec, Canada, IIV3-Q), administered as 1 or 2 (depending on influenza vaccine priming status) half (0.25 mL) or full (0.5 mL) doses in children 6–35m old (table 1). Results. The observed values of hemagglutination inhibition GMT, SCR and SPR after IIV3-D or IIV3-Q vaccination tended to increase when given as 0.5 mL versus 0.25 mL doses (table 2), suggesting a clinically higher immunogenicity of the 0.5 mL dose (Pavia-Ruz et al, Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013;9:1978; Langley et al, J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2012;1:55). Acceptable safety profiles were observed for IIV3-D and IIV3-Q for both dosages, with no difference for fever (table 3) (Pavia-Ruz et al, Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013;9:1978; Langley et al, J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2012;1:55; www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com; study ID: 111635). 0.5 mL doses of GSK Vaccines' quadrivalent IIV (Dresden, IIV4-D; Québec, IIV4-Q) were also well tolerated in 6–35m-olds (Wang et al, PAS 2015; Langley et al, J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc 2014;DOI:10.1093/jpids/piu098; Langley et al, J Infect Dis 2013;208:544; Domachowske et al, J Infect Dis 2013;207:1878; Claeys et al, ESPID 2014). Among GSK Vaccines' IIV for use in 6–35m-olds, 0.5 mL IIV4-Q is approved in Canada and Mexico and none yet in the United States (www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/naci-ccni/flu-grippe-eng.php; www.cofepris.gob.mx/AS/Documents/RegistroSanitarioMedicamentos/Vacunas/Vacunas.pdf). Conclusion. Increasing the IIV dose to 0.5 mL improves immunogenicity without increasing reactogenicity in 6–35m-olds. Funding. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures. L. Wang, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; C. Claeys, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; V. Chandrasekaran, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; P. Li, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; B. L. Innis, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; V. K. Jain, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207