L’apprentissage du shakuhachi japonais et le shugyō, la discipline du soi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buddhism arrived in Japan from China towards the sixth century. This religion became the aristocracy’s spiritual practice and, later on, that of the samurai class, especially Zen Buddhism. Over the following centuries, Zen Buddhism, significantly tinged with Taoism, had an indelible influence on all Japanese arts, including combat arts and the tea ceremony. The ascetic discipline of Buddhist monks is known as shugyō, a term usually translated as “training,” “apprenticeship,” or “discipline,” but which can also be translated as “self-cultivation.” Shugyō considers that all learning begins with the body in order to attain a state of enlightenment in which the body and the spirit are one, that is to say a body-spirit. According to this concept, in the arts, it is not talent that defines the artist, but the individual self that is deployed across the art. The goal of shugyō is therefore not the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, but rather it concerns spiritual development and the artist’s body-spirit ethic in the face of his or her art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".