Bibliographic record
Abstract
For Harry, LSE economics was part of several British networks. He resumed his connection with the Association of University Teachers of Economics and in a contest with Richard Lipsey was elected president for three years in 1968. By virtue of his LSE position, he joined the Council of the Royal Economic Society. He also joined the Council (and later the Executive Committee) of the National Institute for Economic and Social Research. In 1968 he became a member of the London Political Economy Club, founded in 1821 with Robert Malthus, David Ricardo, and James Mill among its original members. He became involved in the making of science policy when he joined the Council on Science Policy in 1968. With these connections, Harry tried to shape his profession's response to changing circumstances and opportunities. Some of his initiatives reflected his American and Canadian experience in discussions of public policy, where he thought there were lessons that could be learned; others reflected the changing English economics profession in a world of expanding enrolments and new universities, for the “typical situation of young people just starting out” in the profession had changed markedly in less than 20 years. [W]hen I started my career in Cambridge, there were very few significant economics departments in the country; most of these were fairly large in numbers; and the proportion of junior to senior faculty was fairly low. Hence young people could establish their reputations by personal contact with their senior colleagues and become recognized in advance of any major publications; and they could readily obtain assistance, advice and comments on their work from their seniors.[…]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.090 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".