MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2488281556 · doi:10.3752/9780968932148.ch10

Tallgrass prairie, ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and the use of fire as a biodiversity and conservation management tool

2010· book-chapter· en· W2488281556 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert E. Roughley, Darren A. Pollock, David J. Wade

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround beetleBiodiversityBiodiversity conservationGeographyAgroforestryEcologyEnvironmental scienceForestryBiologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fire is a key factor that structures the plant and animal communities of tallgrass prairie. Manipulating the timing of fires provides a potential method to influence the diversity of these communities. We examined this potential with a four-year study of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on tallgrass prairie in southern Manitoba. Using pitfall traps, we compared captures of beetles from 1997 to 2000 in control plots of unburned prairie or in plots burned in the spring, summer, or fall of 1997. Results showed that species responded individually to different treatments but that treatment did not alter the composition of the ground beetle community. Further, at least four years appeared necessary for the beetle community to revert back to its pre-burn status. Thus, for ground beetles, a mosaic of burn regimes and burn seasons is likely needed to sustain habitat heterogeneity and species diversity. Resume. Le feu est un facteur cle de la structure des communautes vegetales et animales de la prairie a herbes hautes. La gestion du calendrier des brulis peut constituer un moyen d’influer sur la diversite de ces communautes. Nous examinons cette possibilite dans le cadre d’une etude des carabides (Coleoptera : Carabidae) de la prairie a herbes hautes du sud du Manitoba etalee sur quatre ans. Nous comparons les captures de coleopteres effectuees de 1997 a 2000 a l’aide de pieges a fosse dans des parcelles temoins de prairies non brulees et de parcelles brulees au printemps, en ete ou en automne, en 1997. Les resultats montrent que chaque espece reagit a sa maniere aux divers traitements, mais que ces derniers n’influent pas sur la composition de la communaute de carabides. De plus, il semble qu’il faille au moins quatre ans a la communaute des coleopteres pour revenir a son etat anterieur au traitement. Ainsi, en ce qui concerne les carabides, il semble qu’une mosaique de regimes de brulis soit necessaire pour maintenir l’heterogeneite de l’habitat et la diversite des especes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies→French-language works237,207→