Digulleville’s Pèlerinage de Jésus Christ: A Poem of Courtly Devotion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At two periods separated by a quarter of a century, the monk Guillaume de Digulleville, attached to the Cistercian abbey of Chaalis, north of Paris, composed a series of three allegorical poems devoted to aspects of the Christian life.1 In 1330–1332, Guillaume presented his first vision of the journey of the Christian in this world in the Pèlerinage de vie humaine, a work written in response to the Roman de la rose intended to create an art not of love, but of spiritual pilgrimage. The poem, originally aimed at a lay audience, circulated widely; it survives in fifty-three manuscripts (twenty-three of them cyclic), was adapted into prose in the fifteenth century, and was finally provided with a critical edition in 1893.2 Claiming to be alarmed by its success, Digulleville subjected it to a thorough revision in 1355.3 The second version of the poem was directed to a new (possibly monastic) audience, who were expected to read the work rather than hear it read.4 Less popular than the original version (only nine manuscripts survive, including five of the complete cycle), the revised Vie humaine was the basis of Lydgate's Pilgrimage of the Life of Man, and made the transition to print in two separate editions.5 Unfortunately, this version of the poem has not found a modern editor, and must be consulted in manuscript.KeywordsThirteenth CenturyFifteenth CenturyFourteenth CenturyDirect DiscourseBryn MawrThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".