Contribution of the Individual Small Intestinal α-Glucosidases to Digestion of Unusual α-Linked Glycemic Disaccharides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mammalian mucosal α-glucosidase complexes, maltase-glucoamylase (MGAM) and sucrase-isomaltase (SI), have two catalytic subunits (N- and C-termini). Concurrent with the desire to modulate glycemic response, there has been a focus on di-/oligosaccharides with unusual α-linkages that are digested to glucose slowly by these enzymes. Here, we look at disaccharides with various possible α-linkages and their hydrolysis. Hydrolytic properties of the maltose and sucrose isomers were determined using rat intestinal and individual recombinant α-glucosidases. The individual α-glucosidases had moderate to low hydrolytic activities on all α-linked disaccharides, except trehalose. Maltase (N-terminal MGAM) showed a higher ability to digest α-1,2 and α-1,3 disaccharides, as well as α-1,4, making it the most versatile in α-hydrolytic activity. These findings apply to the development of new glycemic oligosaccharides based on unusual α-linkages for extended glycemic response. It also emphasizes that mammalian mucosal α-glucosidases must be used in in vitro assessment of digestion of such carbohydrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".