MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2488932711 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-3422

Abstract 3422: The influence of genetic and clinical factors on the outcome following a diagnosis of small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type

2016· article· en· W2488932711 on OpenAlexaff
Leora Witkowski, Catherine Goudie, Pilar Ramos, Anthony N. Karnezis, Talia Boshari, Patricia Pautier, Michel Longy, James A. Knost, Emmanouil Saloustros, W. Glenn McCluggage, Martin Hasselblatt, William P.D. Hendricks, David G. Huntsman, Douglas A. Levine, Jeffrey M. Trent, William D. Foulkes

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmall-cell carcinomaGermlineGermline mutationSMARCA4OncologyDiseaseChemotherapyInternal medicineMedicineCancerSomatic cellCohortBiologyMutationGeneticsGeneChromatin remodeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is the most common undifferentiated ovarian tumor diagnosed in women below the age of 40. While it is uncommon, with only ∼500 cases reported, it is an extremely aggressive tumor, with long term survival rates of <30% in early stage disease. Recently, we discovered that SCCOHT is a monogenic disease, attributable to germline and somatic deleterious mutations in the chromatin remodeling gene, SMARCA4. Since then, single case reports have been published on women affected with SCCOHT, but no large studies have been conducted on the effect of these mutations, germline or somatic, on the disease. Furthermore, while numerous publications have described the therapies used in single cases or small cohorts of SCCOHT patients, treatment remains varied, with no standardized protocols. In an attempt to clarify which factors have an effect on the course of the disease, we reviewed all published and a cohort of unpublished SCCOHT cases and collected information on the following factors: stage at diagnosis, age at diagnosis, treatment modality used (chemotherapy/radiotherapy/high dose chemotherapy), mutation type (germline/somatic), and length of survival. We were able to acquire information in at least 2 of these parameters in 267 cases and performed multiple analyses. Clinically, we found that the greatest influence on patient outcome was related to stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001) and treatment modality (p = 0.01), while age at diagnosis had no significant effect (p = 0.72). Molecularly, the presence of a germline mutation in the patient did not affect the age of onset (p = 0.86), nor did it have an effect on the length of survival of the patient (p = 0.63). Overall, this is the largest study conducted to date analyzing the influence of clinical factors on the outcome of patients diagnosed with SCCOHT, and is the first large study to analyze the effect of germline mutations on the outcome of these patients. Citation Format: Leora Witkowski, Catherine Goudie, Pilar Ramos, Anthony N. Karnezis, Talia Boshari, Patricia Pautier, Michel Longy, James A. Knost, Emmanouil Saloustros, W Glenn McCluggage, Martin Hasselblatt, William P. Hendricks, David Huntsman, Douglas A. Levine, Jeffrey Trent, William D. Foulkes. The influence of genetic and clinical factors on the outcome following a diagnosis of small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3422.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207