MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489122245 · doi:10.1057/9780230579538_14

The EU and Interculturality in Croatia after 2000

2007· book-chapter· en· W2489122245 on OpenAlex
Mojmir Križan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean unionPolitical scienceArgument (complex analysis)NationalismCitizenshipPoliticsEthnic groupPolitical economyGender studiesSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colloquially, the wars that led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia (between 1991 and 1995 in the western part of the country and 1999 in Serbia) are seen as the result of an upsurge of atavistic ethnic hatreds, which for decades slumbered below the fragile surface of the Yugoslav political and social order. However, more convincing is the argument that they had an entirely ‘European’ and even a modern and rational function of creating culturally and/or ethnically homogeneous nation-states instead of sustaining the traditional coexistence, communication, mixing and symbiosis of various groups with rather ambiguous and unstable ‘identities’. The function of these wars was to separate the communities by various kinds of ‘ethnic cleansing’, to draw territorial borders between them, and to solidify their particular ‘national identities’.1 This argument is all the more convincing as in Europe in general and in the European Union (EU) in particular, nationalism, although in rather domesticated forms, is still stronger than the feeling of belonging to a common European political formation and the conviction of possessing a citoyenneté européenne — European citizenship.2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it