MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489662276

Peter Pan: 카니발 판토마임으로의 진화 과정 연구(II)

2016· article· ko· W2489662276 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
전준택

Bibliographic record

Venue현대영미드라마 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarnivalesqueDialogicDramaArgument (complex analysis)ArtLiteratureWindsorArt historyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bakhtin’s carnivalesque thesis is contradictory as it argued that drama cannot be carnivalesque while admitting its elements in Feast of Fools, commedia dell’arte, and Shakespeare. Bakhtin’s argument that the public spirit of the carnival metamorphosed only into a novel and that “drama does not allow for the dialogic interpenetration of one language by another” is contradictory as well. Bakhtin did not recognize the unique British pantomime tradition that elaborated commedia dell’arte and thus encouraged the carnivalesque by its heteroglossic conventions: interplay of the opening and harlequinade, interplay of subtitles and casting policies, and the breakdown of the fourth wall by audience participation, etc. This article sets itself the double task of analysing the manuscript, Lord Chamberlain’s copy and the premiere of Peter Pan through Bakhtin’s theories of carnival, while at the same time debating these texts expanded its carnivalesque elements to the full point as it evolved from the draft to the performance. Barrie’s manuscript was a pantomime as the harlequinade, its subtitle, The Boy Who Hated Mothers, and the doubling of Hook and Mrs. Darling demonstrated. Peter came to live with Wendy in Kensington Gardens and this subversive text criticized the harsh and painful Victorian home and school education system together. In Lord Chamberlain’s copy subtitled as The Boy Who Could Not Grow Up, Barrie deconstructed the harlequinade and expanding the carnivalesque element by Wendy’s adoption of an abandoned baby for the future mother figure of Peter. The premiere, subtitled as The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up, was somewhat different in narrative as it separated Peter and Wendy by allowing her to visit Peter just once a year for spring cleansing. However the representation became heteroglossic as it seemed to show Peter and Wendy live together betraying the narrative. In addition the carnivalesque was more expanded by casting an actress to Peter’s role. The meanings thus became more heteroglossic as well as the representation became plural: one, Victorian children subverting an education system, the other, Victorian women liberating harsh and painful socio-political mores of the times. Therefore in its development from the manuscript to the premiere, Peter Pan was intensifying the carnivalesque of British pantomime, turning the Victorian world upside-down.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue현대영미드라마Same topicRussian Literature and Bakhtin StudiesFrench-language works237,207