MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2489698444

Correlation of remote ST segment depression and coronary anatomy during acute coronary occlusion.

2001· article· en· W2489698444 on OpenAlexaff
Albert W. Chan, Naresh Solankhi, John G. Webb, Arthur Dodek, Michael Gaziano, Ronald G. Carere

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRight coronary arteryCardiologyInternal medicineCircumflexArteryST depressionMyocardial infarctionCoronary artery diseaseAngioplastyBalloonOcclusionPercutaneous coronary interventionST segmentCoronary angiography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The appearance of remote ST segment depression (RSTD) on an electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with more extensive infarction and a worse clinical outcome than when RSTD is absent. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether RSTD predicts coronary anatomy during acute coronary occlusion. It was hypothesized that RSTD is associated with the occlusion of a proximal lesion, an extensive artery and an artery without distal collateralization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 113 consecutive patients with single vessel disease undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 12-lead ECGs (recorded at baseline and during balloon inflation) and angiographical data were analyzed independently. Patients with ST segment elevation in the primary territory and RSTD (greater than 1 mm ST depression at 80 ms after the J point) (group A) were compared with patients without RSTD (group B). Proximal lesions were defined as lesions located in the segments proximal to the acute marginal branch, first diagonal artery or first obtuse marginal branch. An extensive right coronary artery (RCA) was one that supplied the posterolateral wall; an extensive left anterior descending (LAD) artery was one that supplied the inferoapical wall; and an extensive circumflex artery was one that supplied the posterior descending artery. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (48%) had PTCA of the proximal vessels, 43 patients (38%) had extensive target vessels and 11 patients (9.7%) had collaterals. Target vessels included 33% in RCA, 44% in LAD artery and 23% in circumflex artery. Forty-five patients (40%) developed RSTD during balloon inflation (group A). Patients in group A were more likely to have extensive vessels on the angiogram than those in group B (group A 49%, group B 31%; P=0.05). None of the patients in group A had collaterals to the culprit artery, while 16% of patients in group B did (P=0.003). The two groups were not significantly different with respect to the number of proximal lesions (group A 58%, group B 42%; P=0.08). Analysis performed according to the target artery revealed that RSTD was associated with occlusion of an extensive RCA during RCA occlusion (extensive RCA in group A 100%, group B 57%; P=0.006). For the LAD artery, RSTD was associated with proximal lesions (group A 74%, group B 41%; P=0.02) and absence of collaterals (group A 100%, group B 74%; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During acute coronary occlusion, the presence of RSTD on 12-lead ECG was specific for the absence of collaterals. The presence of RSTD during RCA occlusion was strongly associated with an extensive RCA, suggestive of posterolateral wall ischemia. During LAD artery occlusion, the presence of RSTD was associated with proximal occlusion, which resulted in ischemia of the LAD artery and the major diagonal artery territories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research→French-language works237,207→