MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2490243894 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2016.2595330

Delay–Rate–Distortion Optimization for Cloud Gaming With Hybrid Streaming

2016· article· en· W2490243894 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoming Nan, Xun Guo, Yan Lu, Yifeng He, Ling Guan, Shipeng Li, Baining Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingGraphicsEncoderBandwidth (computing)ServerVideo qualityFrame rateVideo streamingRate–distortion optimizationReal-time computingQuality of serviceMultimediaVideo trackingComputer networkVideo processingComputer graphics (images)Multiview Video CodingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud gaming as the emerging game service has attracted significant attention. However, traditional video streaming approach suffers from high bandwidth consumption, and traditional graphics streaming approach requires a long initial period to download game models. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid streaming framework, jointly applying video streaming and graphics streaming to provide a high-quality gaming experience. In the proposed framework, cloud servers not only transmit the encoded video frames but also progressively transmit the graphics data, which are used to render a game frame to provide an additional reference to the video encoder. Based on the proposed framework, we investigate the delay-rate-distortion optimization problem, where the source rate between the video stream and the graphics stream is optimized to minimize the overall distortion under the bandwidth and response delay constraints. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid streaming can achieve the lowest distortion under the constraints of bandwidth and response delay, compared with the traditional video streaming and graphics streaming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologySame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207