Biological and biochemical analyses of the distinctive intracellular signals activated by interleukin-4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is a type I cytokine which acts on multiple hemopoietic cells to promote an antibody-mediated response to infection. Dysregulated production or function of IL-4 can exacerbate diseases such as allergy, asthma and rheumatoid arthritis. In order to better understand the biochemical mechanisms by which IL-4 mediates its pleiotropic biological effects, I investigated two distinctive aspects of the intracellular signals activated by IL-4. First, IL-4 is different from most type I cytokines in its inability to activate Ras or Raf-1. IL-4 also fails to support cellular growth. I demonstrated that the signals provided by an active Ras or an inducibly active Raf-1 kinase could synergise with IL-4 to promote cell-cycle progression. Further investigation of the biochemical events associated with the stimulation of long-term growth showed that active Raf-1 not only synergised with IL-4 to stimulate growth, but also to increase levels of c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activity. These observations raise the possibility that Raf-1 may be involved in regulating JNK activity, and that JNK may be involved in mediating certain effects of IL-4. Second, IL-4 and IL-13 are the only cytokines that activate the transcription factor STAT-6. I determined that activation of STAT-6 was required for IL-4- stimulated cell survival. However, I found evidence that this requirement for STAT-6 was indirect, and possibly related to STAT-6-dependent, IL-4-stimulated expression of the IL-4 receptor. I next investigated the hypothesis that STAT-6 was required for IL-4-mediated suppression of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin-12 (IL-12) production in macrophages. When STAT-6 null macrophages were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon γ (IFNγ), I continued to observe a significant inhibition of TNFα and IL-12 by IL- 4, suggesting that IL-4 activates distinct, STAT-6 independent, inhibitory paths. IFNγ antagonizes many of the effects of IL-4, and I determined that IFNγ may regulate the activity of STAT6 by altering expression of a STAT6 inhibitor, Bcl-6. Further investigation into the roles of JNK, Bcl-6 and novel, non-STAT-6-dependent pathways will be important for the design of strategies to therapeutically modulate the intracellular signals activated by IL-4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".