MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2490854855 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.024315

Investigation of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>88</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>via (<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo> </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>) reactions

2016· article· lv· W2490854855 on OpenAlexaff
R. O. Hughes, J. T. Burke, R. J. Casperson, Jutta Escher, S. Ota, J. J. Ressler, N. D. Scielzo, R. A. E. Austin, B. Abromeit, N. J. Foley, E. McCleskey, M. McCleskey, H. I. Park, Thomas J. Ross, A. Saastamoinen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersNational Nuclear Security AdministrationTexas A and M UniversityLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsCyclotronProtonAtomic physicsNuclear physicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The low-spin structure of odd-odd $^{88}\mathrm{Y}$ has been studied via ($p,d\ensuremath{\gamma}$) reactions on an $^{89}\mathrm{Y}$ target. The K150 Cyclotron at the Texas A University Cyclotron Institute was employed to provide a 28.5-MeV proton beam, and particle-$\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and particle-$\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ coincidence data were collected with the STARLiTeR array. A number of new levels and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays have been observed below 2.5 MeV, while level and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray energies as well as spin-parity assignments have been re-evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207