Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the time of Temür's death (1405) the nomadic population of the Dasht-i Qipchāq was in a state of turmoil. After the defeat of Toqtamïsh Khan and the devastation caused to the Ulus of Jochi by the campaigns of Temür, this ulus began to disintegrate. The eastern part of it, the Kök Orda (or the former Ulus of Orda), broke up into several independent groups, the most powerful of which was the tribal confederation of the Manghïts. This confederation, which became known west of the Volga under the name of the Noghay and was ruled until 1419 by the famous amir (or beglerbegi) Edigü, in the first quarter of the fifteenth century occupied the territory between the Volga and the Yayïq. East of the Manghïts, the nomadic population of the Ulus of Shiban became known under the collective name Uzbek (actually, Özbek) apparently already in the second half of the fourteenth century. It is usually assumed (following the explanation given by the seventeenth-century khan-historian Abu'l-Ghāzī of Khiva) that this name was given due to the conversion to Islam of the entire Ulus of Jochi carried out by Uzbek Khan in the first quarter of the fourteenth century. In the early fifteenth century the authority over the Uzbeks was contested by several descendants of Shiban. One of them, Jumaduq, son of Ṣüfī Oghlan, was proclaimed khan in 1425/6, but his authority seems to have been limited to the southern regions of the Ulus of Shiban.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it