MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT142: A phase I open-label, dose escalation study of a novel peptide (SOR-C13) antagonistic to the TRPV6 ion channel in patients with advanced solid tumor cancers

2016· article· en· W2492668869 on OpenAlexaff
Siqing Fu, Hal Hirte, Stephen Welch, T. Toney Ilenchuk, Dominique Dugourd, Tyler Lutes, Christopher Rice, Jack Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development CanadaLondon Health Sciences CentreJuravinski Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineNauseaAdverse effectInternal medicineConstipationAnemiaGastroenterologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: SOR-C13 is a first-in-man selective peptide inhibitor of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 6 (TRPV6) calcium oncochannel. TRPV6 is highly expressed in carcinomas including prostate, breast, lung and ovary and expression is correlated with poor outcomes. TRPV6-mediated Ca2+ entry is responsible for maintaining a high proliferation rate, increasing cell survival and apoptosis resistance. Since SOR-C13 blocks TRPV6-mediated Ca2+ influx it was evaluated as a single agent in patients with late-stage carcinoma. Methods: This was a phase I, multi-center, open-label, dose escalation study to assess safety and tolerability of SOR-C13 in subjects with advanced carcinomas commonly known to express the TRPV6 channel (NCT01578564). Subjects received two 21-day cycles of treatment consisting of SOR-C13 for 3 d on/4 d off, 3 d on/11 d off (21 d/cycle). Tested doses were 1.375, 2.75, 4.13 and 6.2 mg/kg given as i.v. infusion initially over 20 m moving to 90 m. In the event of clinically meaningful response (tumor response or stable disease), additional cycles were offered to subjects. Subjects were assessed for safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy. Results: Twenty-three subjects with advanced refractory solid tumors were in the study. No study drug-related serious adverse events occurred during the study. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (30%), hypoalbuminemia (30%), anemia (30%), urinary tract infection (30%), blood calcium decreased (22%), decreased appetite (22%), nausea (22%), constipation (17%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (17%), cough (17%), blood alkaline phosphatase increased (13%), diarrhea (13%), hypercalcemia (13%), hyperkalemia (13%), hypocalcemia (13%). Anemia (Grade 1 to 3) was the only TEAE reflecting clinically significant hematological abnormalities. In all but one case, these events were assessed as unrelated or unlikely related to the study drug. The only safety concern identified definitely related to SOR-C13 infusion was reductions of serum calcium that were short-lived (resolved during the post-infusion observation time (4 h or within <24 h) and asymptomatic at all doses. A range of safe dosing was established between 4.13 and 6.2 mg/kg. Anti-tumor activity was observed across a wide variety of tumor types. Twelve of 22 evaluable subjects (54.5%) had stable disease after 2 cycles. The duration of response ranged from 4 to 7.5 cycles with one subject still in stable disease after 16 cycles (11 months). Two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed tumor reduction of 7% (4.13 mg/kg) and 27% (6.2 mg/kg) after two cycles with attendant decreases in CA 19-9. Conclusions: SOR-C13 was safe and well tolerated in subjects with advanced solid tumors of epithelial origin and demonstrates potential activity in patients with advanced solid tumor cancer. Citation Format: Siqing Fu, Hal H. Hirte, Stephen Welch, Toney T. Ilenchuk, Dominique Dugourd, Tyler Lutes, Christopher Rice, Jack M. Stewart. A phase I open-label, dose escalation study of a novel peptide (SOR-C13) antagonistic to the TRPV6 ion channel in patients with advanced solid tumor cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT142.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207