MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492729867 · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.66.9077

Intellectual Outcome in Molecular Subgroups of Medulloblastoma

2016· article· en· W2492729867 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Iska Moxon‐Emre, Michael D. Taylor, Éric Bouffet, Kristina K. Hardy, Cynthia Campen, David Malkin, Cynthia Hawkins, Normand Laperrière, Vijay Ramaswamy, Ute Bartels, Nadia Scantlebury, Laura Janzen, Nicole Law, Karin S. Walsh, Donald Mabbott

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedulloblastomaSonic hedgehogMedicineIncidence (geometry)Radiation therapyWnt signaling pathwayInternal medicinePediatricsOncologyPathologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To evaluate intellectual functioning and the implications of limiting radiation exposure in the four biologically distinct subgroups of medulloblastoma: wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4. Patients and Methods A total of 121 patients with medulloblastoma (n = 51, Group 4; n = 25, Group 3; n = 28, SHH; and n = 17, WNT), who were treated between 1991 and 2013 at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), Children's National Health System (Washington, DC), or the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (Palo Alto, CA), had intellectual assessments. First, we compared intellectual trajectories between subgroups. Next, we evaluated the effect of treatment with reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation (CSI) plus a tumor bed boost versus treatments that deliver higher CSI doses and/or larger boost volumes to the brain (all other treatments) within subgroups. Linear mixed modeling was used to determine the stability or change in intelligence scores over time. Results Intellectual outcomes declined comparably in each subgroup except for processing speed; SHH declined less than Group 3 ( P = .04). SHH had the lowest incidence of cerebellar mutism and motor deficits. Treatment with reduced-dose CSI plus a tumor bed boost was associated with preserved intellectual functioning in WNT and Group 4 patients considered together (ie, subgroups containing patients who are candidates for therapy de-escalation), and not in Group 3 or SHH. Across all subgroups, patients in the all other treatments group declined over time (all P < .05). Conclusion SHH patients appear to have the most distinct functional (ie, motor deficits and mutism) outcomes and a unique processing speed trajectory. Only WNT and Group 4 patients seem to benefit from limiting radiation exposure. Our findings highlight the value of conducting subgroup-specific analyses, and can be used to inform novel biologically based treatment protocols for patients with medulloblastoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207