MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2492866333

DEUTERIUM AS A NOVEL TRACER FOR DETERMINING MOISTURE SOURCES IN BUILDING SYSTEMS

2007· article· en· W2492866333 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Jordan, E. L. Schmidt, Patrick H Huelman, Sagar V. Krupa, Bernd Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueWood and Fiber Science (Society of Wood Science and Technology) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoistureWettingEnvironmental scienceWater contentWater vaporTRACERDeuteriumMaterials scienceChemistryComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringNuclear physicsOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many current problems in moisture-related deterioration of housing are found in the building envelope. Components such as interior surfaces, siding, millwork, sheathing, and framing are damaged due to excessive moisture accumulation, which leads to potential biodeterioration (mold and decay). The monetary and health implications of such widespread failures are severely impacting the housing industry. In certain individual cases of wood wetting, the source of liquid water is readily determined: typically, a failure of external sealing allows direct ingress of precipitation into the wall system. There is, however, still a debate on the role of subsequent moisture movement or condensation (from water vapor movement to a cool surface) in wall and roofing system failures. Here we show that deuterium-labeled water introduced into wood through either liquid or vapor phase can be recovered via distillation or mechanical expression. The use of deuterium as a moisture tracer can assist in determining the origin of moisture (particularly through the vapor phase transition), provide insight into current recommended practices for moisture control in buildings, and assess the application of current moisture modeling on existing moisture failures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWood and Fiber Science (Society of Wood Science and Technology)Same topicHygrothermal properties of building materialsFrench-language works237,207