MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2493464915

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT EXTENDERS ON HYPO-OSMOTIC SWELLING OF DOG SEMEN PRESERVED AT 5O C

2016· article· en· W2493464915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arunoday Das, R. K. Biswas, B.C. Deka

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtenderSemenCitric acidSpermYolkAndrologyFructoseChemistryAnimal scienceBiologyMedicineFood science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the preservability of different extenders for dog semen on the basis of hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST). Semen samples from three Labrador Retriever (LR) dogs were collected by digital manipulation method at weekly intervals. The first and second fractions of the ejaculates were collected combinedly in a single collection cup. The semen samples were then extended @ 1:4 in Tris-Egg Yolk- Citric Acid-Glucose (TEYCAG), Tris-Egg Yolk- Citric Acid-Fructose (TEYCAF) and Egg Yolk-Citrate-Glycine-Glucose (EYCGG) extenders by split sample technique and preserved at 5o C. The preserved semen was evaluated for HOST-reacted sperm at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours of preservation. The mean incidence of HOST- reacted sperm was 93.44 ± 1.92, 92.20 ± 1.72 and 85.65 ± 3.01; 87.99 ± 4.35, 85.56 ± 3.82 and 75.34 ± 6.86; 85.03 ± 4.23, 82.25 ± 4.32 and 68.88 ± 7.46; 82.20 ± 4.42, 78.75 ± 5.17 and 59.33 ± 5.10; and 79.51 ± 4.25, 70.00 ± 3.63 and 52.50 ± 3.71 per cent in TEYCAG, TEYCAF and EYCGG extenders at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours of preservation respectively. Analysis of variance revealed that the mean incidence of HOST-reacted sperm differed significantly (P<0.01) between extenders and between preservation periods. But the interaction between extender and preservation period was not significant. The mean percentage of HOST-reacted sperm was significantly (P<0.05) higher in TEYCAG and TEYCAF extenders from that in EYCGG extender irrespective of hour of preservation. The incidence of HOSTreacted spermduring 48 to 120 hours of preservation decreased significantly (P<0.05) from that at 24 hours of preservation irrespective of extender. It was significantly (P<0.05) lower at 96 and 120 hours as compared to that at 48 hours, and at 120 hours than at 72 hours of preservation irrespective of extender. Per cent HOST reacted spermatozoa did not differ significantly between TEYCAG and TEYCAF extenders irrespective of preservation period which might suggest that the two extenders were equally efficacious in providing functional integrity of the plasma membrane of LR dog spermatozoa during preservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Indian Journal of Animal ReproductionSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207