Assessment of Modern Banking Services to Achieve and Realization of E-Commerce and Its Impact on the Profitability of Banks Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate new banking services in order to achieve and the realization of e-commerce and its impact on banks' profitability listed on the stock exchange. This study is an applied research and from the logic implementation is descriptive survey study and the relationship between variables is correlation. In this study, data collection is by using library and field method, according to research hypotheses simple two-variable linear regression model was used. In this study, panel data is used to estimate and analyze quantitative and analytical and descriptive models by using Spss software. Among 3,000 delegates, managers and employees eight banks listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange using cluster sampling of 300 randomly selected as a population, and has been done during the period 2014-2015.The results of Pearson correlation coefficient between the variables of new services banking and e-commerce and profitability is equal to (0.144), which indicates that new services bank has positive impact significant on the Tehran Stock Exchange in order to fulfill ecommerce and profitability of listed banks, which means that a variety of modern banking services and increasing their use not only further caused the fulfill of e-commerce, but also increased the profitability of banks and has a direct impact on the profitability of them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".