MO067LONG-TERM PULSE WAVE VELOCITY AND VO2PEAK OUTCOMES WITH 12 WEEKS OF AEROBIC OR RESISTANCE TRAINING IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: A FOLLOW-UP OF THE EXERT STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction and Aims: Kidney transplantation improves survival, quality of life, and is more cost-effective than other treatments for end stage renal disease (ESRD). Despite this, the incidence for cardiovascular disease remains up to 3 to 5 times higher than the general population. Therefore cardiovascular risk, and the potential interventions to reduce this, are of upmost clinical importance in this patient population. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), the gold standard measure of arterial stiffness, is a known predictor of mortality in ESRD, and cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, has been shown to predict survival in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients. Whilst studies have shown improvement immediately following exercise interventions in both of these outcomes, the long-term effects remain unexplored. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the long-term PWV and relative VO2 peak outcomes following completion of a 12-week aerobic (AT) or resistance training (RT) programme in new kidney transplant recipients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".