Abstract CT147: Phase I studies of AZD1208, a PIM kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia or advanced solid tumors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract AZD1208 is a potent oral ATP-competitive, pan-PIM kinase inhibitor. Here we report the results of 2 Phase 1, open-label, multi-center dose escalation studies, recruiting patients with recurrent or refractory AML or advanced solid tumors including malignant lymphoma. The studies examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of AZD1208 in patients including evaluation of pharmacodynamic biomarkers in the AML study. The AML study was a first-in-patient study where 32 patients were treated and the range of treatment duration ranged from 15 to 27 days. In patients with heavily treated AML, AZD1208 was generally well tolerated up to doses of 700 mg QD, but was not tolerated at the 900 mg dose. The most common AEs reported likely to be associated with AZD1208 were nausea (37.5%), diarrhea (21.9%), vomiting (18.8%) and fatigue (18.8%). Three DLTs were reported including 1 case of Guillain-Barré syndrome at the 700mg dose and 2 cases of rash at the 900mg dose. Although there were no AML responses to AZD1208 treatment, reductions in peripheral blasts were seen in 5 patients. Modulation of PIM mediated biomarkers was observed with a greater than 50% reduction in pBAD in 14 out of 20 patients and a reduction in p4EBP1 in 6 out of 14 patients. There was no correlation of biomarker modulation and peripheral blast reduction. The solid tumor study recruited 35 patients with a median treatment duration of 41 days (range of 10-357 days). The best objective response was stable disease. Similar AEs to those seen in the AML study were observed in the solid tumor study. DLTs were reported in 4 patients including 2 patients with fatigue (800mg), increased GGT (240mg) and vomiting (540mg). In this study, AZD1208 was well tolerated as monotherapy at doses up to 700 mg QD, but was not tolerated at 800 mg QD. The MTD of AZD1208 was not determined in either study due to termination of development, however was below 900 mg in the AML study and below 800 mg in the solid tumor study. The PK of AZD1208 in both studies showed similar characteristics and was highly variable and generally dose proportional across the range of 120 mg to 900 mg. In the solid tumor study the absorption following multiple dosing was rapid, exposure showed time-dependent PK and interestingly, the accumulation ratios of exposure decreased with increasing doses. One possible mechanism for the decreased exposure is through increased CYP3A4 activity, demonstrated from a 4β-hydroxycholesterol assay showing that AZD1208 increased CYP3A4 activity after continuous dosing resulting in increased clearance of AZD1208 and perhaps resulting in decreased clinical activity. Overall, AZD1208 was generally well tolerated; however, there was no clear evidence of anti-tumor activity from AZD1208 monotherapy treatment. Citation Format: Jorge Cortes, Kenji Tamura, Daniel J. DeAngelo, Johann de Bono, David Lorente, Mark Minden, Geoffrey L. Uy, Hagop Kantarjian, Karen Keating, Kristen McEachern, Karthick Vishwanathan, Robert E. Godin, Janet Elizabeth Pease, Emma Dean. Phase I studies of AZD1208, a PIM kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia or advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT147.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it