Security Issues on the Mexico-Guatemala Border and Their Relationship to the New National Security Policy of the United States
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the beginning of President Barack Obama's administration in 2009, a series of summits and agreements have been organized owing to the concern over violence and security in Central America, particularly in Guatemala. The year 2011 was especially significant regarding Central American security issues. In April 2011, the creation of two military bases in Chiapas, a Mexican state bordering Guatemala, was announced. In May, the Organization of American States (OAS) secretary general issued an alert on the seriousness of criminality prevailing in Central America and its possibilities to worsen if criminal organizations continued to establish their operations in this region, where countries are weaker and smaller compared to Mexico and Colombia. On June 22 and 23, the Central American Security Conference was held in Guatemala; 110 representatives attended the conference, among them Spain, the United States, Canada, the OAS, the World Bank, and the Inter-American Bank figured prominently. These events were not only significant but also emblematic of a larger picture of wider security issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it