MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2494884136 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/81.s1.240

The Expression of the Transcription Factors SNAI1 and SNAI2 Throughout Pre-Implantation Development.

2009· article· en· W2494884136 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Bell, Andrew J. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBlastocystCell biologyInner cell massSNAI1EmbryogenesisEmbryoEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionGeneticsDownregulation and upregulationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mouse preimplantation development is characterized by two distinct morphological events: Compaction and Blastocyst Formation. Compaction is initiated at the 8-cell stage where the assembly of adherens (AJ) and tight junction proteins at the surface of the outer blastomeres begin the process of polarization of the outer cells and eventually provides a permeability seal in the outer cells of the early embryo. In concert with the formation of this seal, the Na/K ATPase establishes an ionic gradient across the trophectoderm (TE), which promotes the movement of fluid through aquaporins to form the blastocyst cavity. The blastocyst consists of two cell types: the TE, which will form the embryonic portion of the placenta, and the inner cell mass (ICM), which consists of the precursor cells that will become the embryo proper. Although we understand the role of many of the proteins involved in blastocyst formation, we have not elucidated how those proteins are regulated throughout preimplantation development. Of these, CDH1, an AJ associated protein, and the ATP1B1, a Na/K ATPase associated protein, are regulated by the transcription factors SNAI1 and SNAI2 in many cell types. SNAI1 and SNAI2 normally function to initiate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition throughout mouse development. However, SNAI1 and SNAI2 are also oncogenes and aberrant expression of these proteins will promote cancer metastasis. My hypothesis is that Cdh1 and Atp1b1 are both regulated by SNAI1 and SNAI2 throughout mouse preimplantation development. Real-time RT-PCR was applied to determine the steady state mRNA levels of Snai1 and Snai2 throughout preimplantation development. Snai1 steady state mRNA expression increases at the 2-cell stage and then decreases until the 8-cell stage. The steady state mRNA levels returns to the 1-cell level in the blastocyst. Snai2 steady state mRNA levels decrease at the 2-cell stage during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. Expression begins to increase after the 4-cell stage and reaches its peak at the morula stage. Steady state mRNA then decreases at the blastocyst stage. Immunofluorescence was applied to detect SNAI1 and SNAI2 throughout preimplantation development and revealed that SNAI1 and SNAI2 are asymmetrically localized in each blastomere at the 2-cell and the 4-cell stage. SNAI1 and SNAI2 become exclusively distributed to only the outside cells of the developing embryo from the 8-cell stage onward. In the blastocyst, SNAI1 and SNAI2 are only detectable in the TE. SNAI1 and SNAI2 have a unique localization pattern throughout preimplantation development indicative of a role in lineage specification and TE differentiation. Loss-of-Function and Gain-of-Function studies will be applied to determine whether SNAI1 and SNAI2 play a role in TE differentiation and Cdh1 and Atp1b1 regulation. Together, these results provide further insight into the biochemical pathways that regulate blastocyst formation and provide new insight into the normal function of two oncogenes, SNAI1 and SNAI2 during preimplantation development. Research supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207