MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Brigatinib (BRG) in patients (pts) with crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): First report of efficacy and safety from a pivotal randomized phase (ph) 2 trial (ALTA).

2016· article· en· W2494947788 on OpenAlexaff
Dong‐Wan Kim, Marcello Tiseo, Myung‐Ju Ahn, Karen L. Reckamp, Karin Holmskov Hansen, Sang‐We Kim, Rudolf M. Huber, Howard West, Harry J.M. Groen, Maximilian J. Hochmair, Natasha B. Leighl, Scott Gettinger, Corey J. Langer, Luis Paz‐Ares, Egbert F. Smit, Edward S. Kim, William G Reichmann, David Kerstein, Frank G. Haluska, D. Ross Camidge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrizotinibClinical endpointALK inhibitorInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Lung cancernon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsCeritinibGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialPhases of clinical researchClinical trialSurgeryOncologyMalignant pleural effusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9007 Background: We report the first results of a pivotal ph 2 trial of BRG in pts with ALK+ NSCLC. BRG, an investigational oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with preclinical activity against rearranged ALK and CRZ-resistant mutants, yielded promising clinical activity in CRZ-treated ALK+ NSCLC pts in a ph 1/2 study. As responses and AEs varied with starting BRG dose, two BRG regimens are being evaluated in this ongoing randomized study. Methods: Pts ≥18 y with advanced ALK+ NSCLC whose disease progressed on CRZ and who had received no other ALK TKI were eligible. Pts were stratified by presence of brain metastases at baseline and best response to prior CRZ and randomized 1:1 to receive oral BRG at 90 mg qd (arm A) or 90 mg qd for 7 d followed by 180 mg qd (arm B). Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints included PFS and IRC-assessed confirmed ORR and CNS response/PFS. Results: 222 pts were randomized (arm A/B, n=112/n=110; last pt enrolled 21 Sept 2015): median age was 51 y/57 y; 71%/67% had brain metastases. As of 7 Dec 2015, 63%/74% (A/B) were ongoing; median time on treatment was 25 wk/23 wk. Investigator-assessed ORR in A: 46% (95% CI 36–55%; 39 confirmed responses + 12 single responses awaiting confirmation), including 1 confirmed complete response (CR); ORR in B: 54% (95% CI 44–63%; 49 confirmed responses + 10 single responses awaiting confirmation), including 5 confirmed CRs. Median PFS in A/B: 8.8 mo/11.1 mo (events per arm [A/B]: 44/25). Most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (A/B) included: increased CPK (3%/8%), hypertension (4%/5%), pneumonia (3%/5%), rash (1%/4%), increased lipase (3%/2%), and pneumonitis (2%/3%). Early-onset pulmonary events (within first 7 d) occurred in 6% of pts (3% grade ≥3); no such events occurred within 7 d of escalation to 180 mg in arm B. Discontinuations and dose reductions due to AEs (A/B) were 3%/6% and 7%/18%, respectively. Conclusions: In each arm, BRG yielded substantial responses and robust PFS, with an acceptable safety profile. A ph 3 study of BRG at 90 mg qd for 7 d followed by 180 mg qd vs CRZ in TKI-naive, advanced ALK+ NSCLC is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02094573.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207