Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relation between theory and poetry, the critical and creative word, is the focus of this section of my study. Interpretation and recognition are key concerns through this book. The writers and figures have grappled with what it means to write in the experience and thought of modernity. Who can sign and interpret signs in an industrial and technological world? In the Atlantic world, Northrop Frye wrestled with his theoretical imagination, exploring the borderlands between the creative and critical. His quest in print is in the framework of interpretation and recognition. The film version of Death of A Salesman also attempts to represent the tragedy of the common man between dream and actuality, expressionism and the apparently realistic or everyday medium of film. Willy Loman’s realization and self-realization find many interpretations, even among his family members, such as Linda and Biff This section is built on an examination of wide-ranging texts in the opening section on recognition and a discussion of history in New France, the Thirteen Colonies, and Canada as well as women of different backgrounds writing in and about Canada and the relation between T.E. Lawrence and others, such as the Shaws, in his quest for and against recognition. Framing these discussions of those mainly in the North Atlantic basinfrom Canada, the British Empire, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Ireland—I have centered much of the discussion on poetry and poetics, theory and practice, on the ways and means of recognition and the role of blindness and insight from Greek, whether it be the language, philosophy, literary criticism, and various genres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".