CuO‐CeO<sub>2</sub>/ZSM‐5 composites for reactive adsorption of hydrogen sulphide at high temperature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The high‐temperature H 2 S removal at 500–700 °C was conducted over CuO‐CeO 2 /ZSM‐5 composites prepared with sol‐gel method. 7Cu3Ce/ZSM‐5 partially reacting at 500 °C yielded Cu 7 S 4 and Cu 2 S. The major sulphidation products at 600 °C were Ce 2 O 2 S, Cu 2 S, CuS, and S. Sulphidation of 7Cu3Ce/ZSM‐5 at 700 °C yielded Ce 2 S 3 , Cu 2 S, Cu 2 S, and S. Sulphidation of 7Cu3Ce/ZSM‐5 with 20 % H 2 and 20 % CO generated the same products Ce 2 O 2 S, Cu 2 S, Cu 2 S, and S. Increase in the degree of crystallinity of 7Cu3Ce/ZSM‐5 resulted in the decrease of sulphur capacity during the sulphidation and regeneration process. Experimental results showed that the activity of CuO improved by adding Ce; 7Cu3Ce/ZSM‐5 performed the optimal sulphiation behaviour at 600 °C with sulphur capacity of 1429 μmol/g (micromoles of sulphur per gram) due to the synergy of CuO and CeO 2 . H 2 repressed sulphur removal, causing the reduction of sulphur capacity from 1429 to 1014 μmol/g. CO had little impact on sulphidation reaction; sulphur capacity only reduced from 1429 to 1221 μmol/g due to the presence of 20 % CO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it