MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2495584274 · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-370-1_15

Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of Small Molecules and Plasma Proteins

2013· book-chapter· en· W2495584274 on OpenAlexafffund
Cassie Ho, Hua‐Zhong Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromethods · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAptamerBiosensorAnalyteNanotechnologySmall moleculeOligonucleotideComputational biologyMaterials scienceComputer scienceChemistryMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to detect the presence of certain molecular analytes inside the human body is vital to the ability of a medical professional to assess a patient’s health. The use of sensitive and selective biosensors would be a tremendous asset to the field of medical screening and diagnosis. The fabrication of aptamer-based electrochemical biosensors as an emerging technology has made the detection of both small and macromolecular analytes easier, faster, and more suited for the ongoing transition from fundamental analytical science to the early detection of diseases. Aptamers are synthetic oligonucleotides that have undergone iterative rounds of in vitro selection for binding with high affinity to specific analytes of choice; a sensitive yet simple method to utilize aptamers as recognition entities for the development of biosensors is to transduce the signal electrochemically. In this chapter, we will summarize the state-of-the-art research progresses on aptamer-based electrochemical biosensors for the detection of both plasma proteins and small molecules. The targeted portable electronic devices, as they can be operated by the patients during their day-to-day lives, have the potential to revolutionize the delivery of medical treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuromethodsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207