MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2495641607 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139003544.012

The Approach of War

2011· book-chapter· en· W2495641607 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Howson

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandateLeagueGermanSanctionsSpanish Civil WarPrime ministerEconomic historyPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)DecreeLawAncient historyHistoryPoliticsPhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rise of Hitler in Germany eventually led the National Government to announce in March 1935 a policy of rearmament which went slowly into effect in 1936. In June 1935 Stanley Baldwin replaced MacDonald as Prime Minister; in November he called a general election which returned his government and gave it a mandate for rearmament. Meanwhile Mussolini had decided to attack Abyssinia: economic sanctions imposed by the League of Nations failed to stop him and were withdrawn in June 1936. Three months earlier Hitler had sent German troops into the Rhineland; neither France nor Britain was prepared to act, the latter only offering France and Belgium a guarantee against future aggression. And in the summer of 1936 there came the Spanish civil war when the Spanish generals led by Francisco Franco rebelled against the elected republican government. Lionel accepted public opinion would not permit British action over the Rhineland. Although, as he told his sister on 9 April, he was ‘not averse to fighting them…there would be a moral disadvantage in fighting on an issue about which 50% of the population at home took the German view. But I would arm & refuse to negotiate.’ As he told his father two days earlier, there was no point in negotiating with a ‘blackguard’ whereas rearmament might mean that ‘if we call his bluff now we can avoid bloodshed which otherwise is inevitable if not in my time at any rate in Richard’s’. With respect to Spain he thought his father would feel as he did in August that ‘the government here [in Britain] has done well to keep us out of it. “A plague on both their houses” say I.…I can see no outcome which can be regarded as good.’ He was beginning to despair of the League of Nations: ‘I am as much a believer in the necessity of a super-national authority as ever. But I don't want to be dragged into these totally unsympathetic quarrels of the right & left in faction ridden Europe & I don't want a League which is a disguise for a Triple Entente & now that the attempt to save Abyssinia has broken down completely, I feel more & more that a greater detachment from Europe is the best we can hope for at the moment. Of course the situation might change any moment so as to offer more hope. But I am not optimistic.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.018
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207