Synthesis of 3-Aminoimidazo[1,2-<i>a</i>]pyridines from α-Aminopyridinyl Amides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3-Aminoimidazo[1,2- a ]pyridines are rapidly synthesized via a facile and mild cyclodehydration-aromatization reaction starting from readily available amides. The cyclodehydration step is mediated by the activation of N -Boc-protected 2-aminopyridine-containing amides by triflic anhydride (Tf 2 O) in the presence of 2-methoxypyridine (2-MeO-Py). Subsequently, the addition of K 2 CO 3 in THF ensured a clean deprotection-aromatization sequence to afford the desired heterocycle. A wide variety of functional groups and substitution patterns were tolerated under the optimized procedure, and good to excellent yields were obtained for the fused bicyclic 3-aza-heterocycles. In addition, the reaction was found to be scalable to gram-scale and could be performed with unprotected acyclic amide precursors. We also found that the resulting products were valuable intermediates for both Pd- and Ru-catalyzed C–H arylation reactions, allowing for the elaboration to diversely functionalized building blocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".