MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2495719566 · doi:10.7282/t3vq34j2

Attribution of snow melt onset and linkages across the northern hemisphere cryosphere

2015· article· en· W2495719566 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Mioduszewski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryosphereNorthern HemisphereSnowClimatologyGeologySnowmeltPhysical geographyGeographySea iceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the region of Earth most sensitive to climate change, spring snowmelt serves as a measurable indicator of climate change and plays a strong role in the feedbacks that amplify Arctic warming. These feedbacks are strongest over sea ice and the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) as these surfaces continue to melt through the summer and potentially impact one another. The first component of this study characterizes the snow melt season and attributes melt onset both at a hemispheric scale and regionally in northern Canada. Analysis is then expanded to the melt onset date (MOD) on sea ice and the GrIS where covariability is addressed extending into the summer melt season. MOD and sea ice concentration (SIC) data are obtained from passive microwave satellite datasets, while NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) provides energy balance and meteorological fields with primarily meltwater production used as output from a regional climate model (Modèle Atmosphérique Régional, MAR) for the period 1979 - 2013. Across much of the Northern Hemisphere, energy advection plays a larger role in melt onset in regions where snow begins melting in March and April, while shortwave fluxes have a greater influence where the MOD occurs in May and June. As the MOD arrives earlier, this implies that there is a potential shift in snow melt drivers toward those involved in advective processes. Comparable results are found in the regional study, where melt is controlled more by advective energy where melt onset begins sooner, compared to higher levels of radiative energy further north. Analysis of the remainder of the Arctic finds strong covariability among Greenland meltwater production, 500 hPa geopotential heights, and SIC, particularly in Baffin Bay, Fram Strait, and Beaufort Sea early in the summer. Most of this covariance is likely due to simultaneous influence of the atmospheric circulation anomalies, though there may be a local influence from Baffin Bay to the GrIS. Height anomalies from Greenland to Beaufort Sea favor the largest anomalies in meltwater production, and positive height anomalies in this configuration have shown the greatest increase in frequency of any pattern in the study period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→