MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2495974972 · doi:10.1002/ejic.201600412

Nano‐Nonanuclear Mixed‐Lanthanide Clusters [Eu<sub>9–<i>x</i></sub>Tb<i><sub>x</sub></i>] Featuring Tunable Dual Luminescence Properties

2016· article· en· W2495974972 on OpenAlexaff
Djamila Guettas, Cristina M. Balogh, Camille Sonneville, Ylane Malicet, Florian Lepoivre, Emel Önal, Alexandra Fateeva, Christian Reber, Dominique Luneau, Olivier Maury, Guillaume Pilet

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanthanideLuminescenceChemistrySpectroscopyIonInductively coupled plasmaStoichiometryPowder diffractionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyPhysical chemistryMaterials sciencePlasmaOrganic chemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five Tb 3+ /Eu 3+ mixed nonanuclear clusters with the general formula [Eu 9– x Tb x (acac) 16 (µ 3 ‐OH) 8 (µ 4 ‐O)(µ 4 ‐OH)] ([Eu 9– x Tb x ], x = 0.9–8.1, acac = acetylacetonate) were synthesized. Characterization by powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP‐OES) highlight a near‐perfect match between the amounts of Tb 3+ and Eu 3+ ions input in the reaction mixture and the amounts in the clusters. The luminescence properties of these [Eu 9– x Tb x ] clusters were investigated thoroughly in the solid state, and a strong energy transfer from the Tb 3+ to Eu 3+ emitters was evidenced. Thus, these nano‐nonanuclear 4f clusters, which can be viewed as square pyramids that share one top, exhibit dual luminescence that can be adjusted by controlling the ratio of the lanthanide ions within the crystal architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Inorganic ChemistrySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207