MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2496234200 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2596098

Voltage Regulation in Islanded Microgrids Using Distributed Constraint Satisfaction

2016· article· en· W2496234200 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVoltage droopVoltage regulationControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceController (irrigation)Distributed generationVoltageAsynchronous communicationVoltage dropVoltage regulatorEngineeringDistributed computingControl (management)Computer networkElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Droop control is a key control method for operating islanded microgrids (IMGs). The settings of the droop parameters for distributed generation (DG) units can considerably affect the ability of an IMG to satisfy the required voltage tolerance boundary prescribed in steady-state voltage regulation standards. This paper analyzes the complexity of voltage regulations in droop-controlled IMGs. A new algorithm is proposed to satisfy the voltage regulation requirements of IMGs. The proposed algorithm obviates the need for a centralized secondary controller, where each DG unit updates its own voltage droop parameters, autonomously, via interaction with other DG units, using a low-bandwidth, peer-to-peer communication network. To that end, a distributed constraint satisfaction approach is adopted to formulate the problem of voltage regulation in a multi-agent environment. An asynchronous weak commitment technique is proposed to solve the formulated problem. Several case studies are simulated to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. The results show that the proposed algorithm can effectively mitigate the challenges of voltage regulation in IMG systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it