Neuromodulation and state-dependent activities in forebrain neuronal circuits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this chapter we discuss the organization, connectivity and neuronal properties of different modulatory systems located in the brainstem core, hypothalamus and basal forebrain. These systems exert widespread effects on the thalamus, neocortex, perirhinal cortices, amygdala and related subsystems. Typically, they have an activating effect on target neurons. Activation is defined as a state of readiness in cerebral networks, a state of membrane polarization which brings neurons closer to firing threshold, thus ensuring reliable synaptic transmission and quick responses (Steriade, 1991), without, however, losing sculpting inhibitory processes of short duration that are necessary during the adaptive state of waking (Jasper, 1958; Steriade, 2003c). One of the major points in this chapter is the demonstration that none of the ascending activating systems is the awakening ‘centre’. In fact, no wake or sleep state can be said to have a centre and even few, if any, components of waking–sleep states have a centre. Functionally, a neural centre may be thought of as subserving only one function. A behavioural state centre would imply a group of neurons, homogeneous in their input–output organization and chemical code(s), and having the required pathways to control the activity of the final effectors of the events involved in that behavioural state (Steriade & McCarley, 2005). Among additional criteria, the centre, when deafferented from its major inputs, should continue to generate the state or to exhibit some of the defining electrographic signs of the state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".