MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract CT146: A phase IB study of the combination of AZD6244 hydrogen sulfate (selumetinib) and cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced solid tumors with an expansion cohort in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

2016· article· en· W2496973033 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Capasso, Arvind Dasari, A. Craig Lockhart, Mark N. Stein, Hanna K. Sanoff, James Lee, Aaron R. Hansen, Tanios Bekaii‐Saab, Sarah Rippke, James C. Yao, Funda Meric‐Bernstam, Sabine Eckhardt, Christopher H. Lieu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelumetinibWnt signaling pathwayMedicineKRASMEK inhibitorColorectal cancerCancer researchCancerOncologyMAPK/ERK pathwayInternal medicinePharmacologyKinaseBiologySignal transductionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Targeting MEK is of great interest in the development of novel agents for treatment of a variety of malignancies. Resistance to MEK inhibitors has delayed the development of novel agents, and better strategies are needed to overcome acquired resistance. Preclinical studies performed at the University of Colorado in KRAS mutant cell lines have shown that several members of the Wnt pathway are overexpressed in cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib. Gene set enrichment analysis and synthetic lethal screens demonstrated that genes involved in the canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways were upregulated in selumetinib-resistant CRC cell lines, whereas the combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A (CsA), a WNT pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We are conducting an NCI CTEP-approved Phase I/IB trial of the combination of selumetinib and CsA. Biomarkers of response to therapy are being co-developed in a preclinical trial of MEK/WNT inhibition in PDX models. We hypothesize that this combination will be safe, potentially effective in patients with mCRC and that upregulation of FZD2 may predict for sensitivity. Methods: This is a dose-escalation phase I trial investigating the combination of selumetinib and CsA in patients with solid tumors with an expansion cohort in patients with mCRC (n = 20). The expansion cohort will utilize a “run-in” of MEK inhibition alone to evaluate adaptive mechanisms of resistance that may identify those patients most likely to respond to the combination. An adaptive statistical design will be used to assess both KRAS/NRAS wild-type and mutant CRC to determine whether either or both subsets should be studied further in phase II trials. Results: As of January 15, 2016, a total of 18 patients have been enrolled and treated with selumetinib and CsA in the escalation phase. One DLT was reported in cohort 1 (G3 hypertension), and three DLTs (G3 hypertension, rash and elevated creatinine) were reported in cohort 2 (n = 12). Grade 1 or 2 nausea (67%) and rash (50%) were reported as the most common AEs. One unconfirmed partial response was noted (CRC KRAS mut), and 9 patients exhibited stable disease as their best response. One patient maintained stable disease for over 9 months. Disease control rate was 56% in the escalation cohort. Preclinical studies are currently being performed using next-generation MEK and WNT inhibitors in CRC PDX models. Conclusions: The combination of selumetinib and CsA is well tolerated with evidence of preliminary anti-tumor activity. Selumetinib at 75mg/kg BID and CsA at 2mg/kg was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose. The dose expansion in patients with metastatic CRC is underway. Preclinical studies and tissue acquisition for correlative studies are ongoing. Citation Format: Anna Capasso, Arvind Dasari, A. Craig Lockhart, Mark Stein, Hanna Sanoff, James Lee, Aaron Hansen, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Sarah Rippke, James Yao, Funda Meric-Bernstam, S Gail Eckhardt, Christopher h. Lieu. A phase IB study of the combination of AZD6244 hydrogen sulfate (selumetinib) and cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced solid tumors with an expansion cohort in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT146.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→