MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GATA2 is critical for mast cell differentiation and maintenance

2016· article· en· W2497217626 on OpenAlexaff
Yapeng Li, Bing Liu, Kara Lukin, Fred D. Finkelman, James Hagman, Axel Roers, Hua Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsJewish Rehabilitation Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGATA2Mast cellBasophilProgenitor cellBiologyCell biologyCellular differentiationImmunoglobulin EImmunologyHaematopoiesisStem cellInterleukin 33GeneGeneticsCytokineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2) plays critical roles in hematopoietic stem cell survival and proliferation, granulocyte–monocyte progenitor differentiation, and basophil and mast cell differentiation. However, precise roles of GATA2 in mast cell differentiation and maintenance have not been delineated. We identified GATA2 is essential for pre-basophil and mast cell progenitors (pre-BMPs) to differentiate into mast cells. We found that GATA2 is critical in maintaining the expression of a wide range of genes that are important for performing mast cell functions. To determine the in vivo role of GATA2 in mast cell development, we generated connective tissue mast cell-specific Gata2 deficient mice. We found that Gata2 was required for connective tissue mast cell development. These mice failed to develop IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. GATA2 regulated the expression of Hdc gene, which is critical for IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, by binding to regulatory regions of the Hdc gene to promote its transcription. Our study reveals GATA2 is critical for mast cell differentiation and maintenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207