MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2497973395 · doi:10.21273/jashs.139.6.642

Genetic Variation and Heritability Estimates for Indirect Measures of Freezing Tolerance during Fall Acclimation in Asparagus

2014· article· en· W2497973395 on OpenAlexafffund
Jae Joon Kim, David J. Wolyn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersAgricultural Adaptation Council
KeywordsBiologyAsparagusFreezing toleranceHeritabilityRhizomeBotanyBoltingGermplasmHorticultureSucroseFernAcclimatizationChlorophyllAgronomyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Winterhardiness is an important trait for asparagus ( Asparagus officinalis ) cultivars grown in temperate climates. Several biochemical and physiological parameters are correlated with the acquisition of freezing tolerance during cold acclimation in the fall and could be used as indirect measures for selection in a breeding program. Genetic variation was assessed before and after fall acclimation in August and November, respectively, for freezing tolerance attributes in 18 asparagus hybrids and 24 clones, which included male, supermale, and female genotypes. Fern chlorophyll and rhizome sucrose concentrations and storage root and rhizome percentage water decreased, whereas the concentrations of storage root proline, glucose and sucrose, and rhizome proline and high-molecular-weight fructan increased during the fall. Germplasm did not differ in August but significant variation was observed in November for most parameters, indicating genotype-specific responses to fall acclimation and the acquisition of traits associated with freezing tolerance. Narrow-sense heritability estimates were significant for fern chlorophyll, storage root proline, and rhizome glucose and sucrose concentrations. With significant genetic variation and heritability, breeding to improve freezing tolerance could be possible with indirect selection measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society for Horticultural ScienceSame topicPhytochemical Studies and BioactivitiesFrench-language works237,207